Looking for:

Zoom h4 vs h5 vs h6

Click here to ENTER


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jan 02,  · Product info: this video Lane discusses the differences between the ZOOM H4n Pro, the H5, and H6 audio field recorders. Aug 28,  · The main reasons for that were the highly upgraded preamps and the fact you can use the interchangeable heads that were designed originally for the Zoom H6. Improved Pre-Amps. To cover the first, the pre-amps in the Zoom H5 are far superior to the H4n. This was the one complaint made against the otherwise great little ted Reading Time: 7 mins. The H5 has the same preamps as the H5. out of the both NTG3 hands down. but honestly i would save up for a F4 instead of a H recorder — H5/H6 just SUCK to be used in a bag and also the filenaming is just horrendous. they cost a bit more but it is absolutely worth it if you want to get remotely professional jobs.
 
 

 

Zoom h4 vs h5 vs h6.Product Comparison: Zoom H4N PRO vs Zoom H5

 

Originally Posted by SprintBob. The iZotope Spire is worth a look too if you are considering one of the Zoom recorders. I have both a Spire and H5 and find the Spire is bit easier to use than the Zoom. Both are great quality products to get you started with home recording. They work pretty good with their supplied on board mics but you have the option to use higher quality outboard mics with both. I use Reaper as my DAW. The Spire is cool if you are recording no more than two sources at a time and want to experiment with multitracking.

The Zoom H recorders are better for recording a couple of musicians all at once especially the H6. Originally Posted by Fran Guidry. I don’t know what causes the issue, but it appears that when the H5 is used as an interface is gives a distorted result. A number of posts on various forums describe the result as a phasey or tinny sound, and a lot of the complaints are specific to acoustic guitar recordings.

I haven’t heard of any resolution. I have since fallen back in love with the H4N series. I’ve also used it to capture my noisy rock band gigs on the auto level setting and as long as the FOH mix is good, it’s usually decent. The boot up time is a bit of a drag but it seems to be an issue across the line. On the other hand, the H5 seemed to have some reduced low frequencies.

They both have enough range, both in frequency and dynamic, to handle it. Additionally, the Zoom H6 has a 12db pad switch which can be engaged for each of the channels, if you so wish. This allows you to record high volume sources without having distortion. The Zoom H5 however, does not have this pad switch, you would need to use the gain knobs if the source is too loud. The Zoom H4n Pro and the H5 are similar in many aspects, but one notable difference is the safety recording feature on the H4n pro.

Of course, the H5 has its own advantages over the H4n Pro , but this particular feature makes me lean towards the latter in any Zoom H4n pro vs h5 comparison. Also, in my comprehensive Zoom H4n pro vs H5 article , I pitched my tent with the H5, mainly because of the removable mic, longer battery life and the option of increasing the audio inputs from two to four. Needless to say, the same goes for Zoom h4n vs h6.

The Zoom H6 is definitely an upgrade of the Zoom H5. However, the features that were improved may not be important for everyone. This particular difference may be important enough for you to consider changing your H5, especially if you record bands rehearsals or performances, or you record sounds from nature. On the other hand, if all you need is a microphone for podcasting , then the H5 will do a very good job.

Even if you use the H6, you may end up using the low cut filter anyway. Whatever you are using the Zoom H5 for, you now have enough information to know whether to switch to the newer H6 or just stay put. Sampling rate. Maximum recording time. Voice-activated recording.

Supported file formats. So, if your main recording peaks out, you now have a recovery. Now, this only works on the stereo input. It doesn’t work on any of the XLR inputs. So, for example, if you’re running a wireless lav you’re going to need to plug in your standard 3. If you don’t need more than four inputs, the H5 is actually my favorite. It’s the lightest, it fills the best in your hand and with this removable capsule, it gives a lot of options.

There are a few more minor differences, such as the H4 and the H5 both use double-As while the H6 requires four double-As. You’re going to get about 6 hours of use on the H4, 15 hours of use on the H5 and 20 hours on the H6.

Both the H4 and the H5 have monochrome displays while the H6 is full color. Full color LCD x pixels. Compressor, limiter, low-cut filter, playback looping, pitch change, variable playback speed, metronome, guitar tuner. How many recording channels do you need? Another factor is the oft-overlooked batteries. Not only are batteries expensive, but by the time you are loaded up with two or three sets of spares you will have also burdened your camera bag that much more.

If you need phantom power for any external microphones, expect your batteries to run out significantly sooner than the hour battery ratings. Keep in mind that the EXH-6 input capsule sold separately , which adds two additional XLR inputs to either recorder, is not able to provide phantom power.

Most environments in which you are plugging in 5 or 6 different microphones are probably indoors and bound to also have some sort of outlet for AC or USB power.

 
 

Zoom h4 vs h5 vs h6 –

 
 
I think the answer to this question comes down to one factor: will you be recording more than 2 people on a regular basis, sometimes more than 4. I have the Zoom H6 which I guess is more similar to the H5 than H4N. I would go with the H5 between your two options. I actually mostly use mine. The Zoom H recorders are better for recording a couple of musicians all at once (especially the H6). They really aren’t direct competitors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.